Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Masyrif publishes original research analysis and inquiry into finance, management, economics, accounting and business issues. Masyrif is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to contemporary issues of finance, management, economics, accounting and business.

we are open to article related to:

1. Accounting and Finance

  • Management accounting
  • Financial accounting
  • Business accounting
  • Cost accounting
  • Accounting information system
  • Auditing and assurance
  • Accounting process and systems
  • Corporate governance
  • Taxation
  • Cost management
  • Corporate finance and governance
  • Capital markets
  • Derivatives and structured products
  • Empirical finance
  • Behavioral finance
  • Managerial finance
  • Investment
  • Financial portfolio
  • Business fluctuations and cycles
  • Currencies
  • Sovereign debts and bonds
  • Fraud and risks management
  • Insurance

2. Economics

  • Economic development
  • Economic methodology
  • Economic policy
  • Economic systems
  • Growth, aggregate and productivity
  • Micro and macro economics
  • Global economics
  • Green economics
  • Household behavior and family economics
  • Financial economics
  • Labor economics
  • Public economics
  • Regulatory economics
  • Welfare economics

3. Marketing

  • Advertising
  • Communication system
  • Marketing channels
  • Consumer behavior
  • Market structure
  • Product management
  • Supply chain management
  • Pricing
  • Promotion
  • Public relations
  • Brand management
  • Direct marketing
  • Service marketing
  • Relationship marketing

4. Human Resource Management

  • Performance management
  • Talent management
  • Knowledge management
  • Compensation
  • Training and development
  • Organizational health and safety
  • Organizational justice
  • Organization change and development
  • Employee welfare
  • Leadership
  • Policy planning and development
  • Labor relations
  • Organizational behavior
  • Industrial relationship

5. Entrepreneurship

  • Entrepreneurship modeling
  • Entrepreneurship and innovation
  • Entrepreneurial universities
  • Entrepreneurship education
  • New technology ventures
  • University – Industry collaboration
  • Technology entrepreneurship
  • Social entrepreneurship
  • Green or sustainable entrepreneurship
  • Corporate entrepreneurship
  • Cyber entrepreneurship
  • Young entrepreneurs development
  • Women entrepreneurs development
  • Policies for entrepreneurship
  • Business incubator management
  • Campus entrepreneurship

6. General Management

  • Administrative Science and Policies
  • Operations management
  • Quantitative management
  • Sustainability management
  • Change management
  • Strategic management
  • Technology management
  • Information management
  • Office management
  • Office management system
  • Management information system
  • Management science
  • Ethics
  • Business law
  • Industrial law

7. International Studies

  • Global strategy
  • Global issues
  • International economics
  • International finance
  • International management
  • International marketing
  • International human resource management
  • Cross-cultural management
  • Culture and custom
  • Knowledge transfer
  • Global security

8. Contemporary Islamic Studies

  • Muamalat
  • Fiqh Muamalat
  • Islamic business ethics
  • Islamic marketing
  • Islamic organization and governance
  • Islamic finance
  • Islamic banking
  • Islamic entrepreneurship
  • Transactions in Islamic banking and finance
  • Halal certification and quality Management
  • Estates management and Baitul Mal
  • Islamic inheritance and Wasiyyah
  • Islamic economics
  • Islamic business management and leadership
  • Takaful and re-Takaful management
  • Islamic fund management
  • Laws related to Islamic business
  • Islamic business policies
  • Waqaf management


Section Policies

Articles

  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Each submitted manuscript will undergo the following  peer-review process:

  1. The editor performs a technical and administrative assessment of the submitted manuscript.
  2. The editor delivers the manuscript that qualifies the technical and administrative assessment for the blind review process. Manuscripts not qualifying the technical and administrative assessments are returned to the authors.
  3. Reviewers review the manuscript and make decisions.
  4. The editor sends the reviewers’ decisions and recommendations to the authors along with the deadline for revision (if the decisions are minor/ major revision).
  5. Editor sends a ready-to-publish version to the authors before the publication for approval. Once approved by the authors, the manuscript cannot be changed.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public, supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Plagiarism Policy

Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen.

All the manuscripts will be subjected to pre-screening of plagiarism check by using Turnitin Software. The screening process will be conducted by Editor once the mnuscript is received. 

 

Definition:

Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

 Policy:

Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

When plagiarism is identified, the Editor in Chief responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:

Level of Plagiarism

 1.Minor :

A short section of another article is plagiarized without any significant data or      idea taken from the other paper

Action : A warning is given to the authors and a request to change the text and properly cite the original article is made

2.Intermediate: A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized without proper citation to the original paper

Action: The submitted article is rejected and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for one year

3. Severe : A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized that involves reproducing original results or ideas presented in another publication

Action: The paper is rejected and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for five years.

 

It is understood that all authors are responsible for the content of their submitted paper as they all sign Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen Copyright Transfer Form. If a penalty is imposed for plagiarism, all authors will be subject to the same penalty.

If a second case of plagiarism by the same author(s) is identified, a decision on the measures to be enforced will be made by the Editorial board (Editor-in-Chief, and Editorial members) with the Chair of the Editor in Chief. The author(s) might be forbidden to submit further articles forever.

This policy applies also to material reproduced from another publication by the same author(s). If an author uses text or figures that have previously been published, the corresponding paragraphs or figures should be identified and the previous publication referenced. It is understood that in case of a review paper or a paper of a tutorial nature much of the material was previously published.

The author should identify the source of the previously published material and obtain permission from the original author and the publisher. If an author submits a manuscript to IJRED with significant overlap with a manuscript submitted to another journal simultaneously, and this overlap is discovered during the review process or after the publications of both papers, the editor of the other journal is notified and the case is treated as a severe plagiarism case. Significant overlap means use of identical or almost identical figures and identical or slightly modified text for one half or more of the paper. For self plagiarism of less than one half of the paper but more than one tenth of the paper, the case shall be treated as intermediate plagiarism. If self plagiarism is confined to the methods section, the case shall be considered as minor plagiarism.

 If an author uses some of his previously published material to clarify the presentation of new results, the previously published material shall be identified and the difference to the present publication shall be mentioned. Permission to republish must be obtained from the copyright holder. In the case of a manuscript that was originally published in conference proceedings and then is submitted for publication in Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen either in identical or in expanded form, the authors must identify the name of the conference proceedings and the date of the publication and obtain permission to republish from the copyright holder. The editor may decide not to accept this paper for publication.

However, an author shall be permitted to use material from an unpublished presentation, including visual displays, in a subsequent journal publication. In the case of a publication being submitted that was originally published in another language, the title, date and journal of the original publication must be identified by the authors, and the copyright must be obtained. The editor may accept such a translated publication to bring it to the attention of a wider audience. The editor may select a specific paper that had been published (e.g. a “historic” paper) for republication in order to provide a better perspective of a series of papers published in one issue of Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen. This republication shall be clearly identified as such and the date and journal of the original publication shall be given, and the permission of the author(s) and the publisher shall be obtained.

Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen layout editor for the Journal is responsible for maintaining the list of authors subjected to penalties and will check that no authors of a submitted paper are on this list. If a banned author is identified, the layout editor will inform the Editor-in-Chief who will take appropriate measures. This policy will be posted on the web site with the instructions for submitting a manuscript, and a copy will be sent to the authors with the confirmation email upon initial receipt of their original manuscript. A sentence shall be added to the copyright transfer form to indicate that the author(s) have read the Plagiarism Policy.

 

Author Fees

This journal does not charges any submission or publication fees. No fees incurred for article processing, submission, neither reviewing the articles. All publication charge are sponsored by Institut Dirosat Islamiyah Al-Amien Prenduan Sumenep.

Publication Ethics

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed is a significant contribution to management and  business research especially for emerging market issues and the process of improving science. The articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for the author, the editor, the peer reviewer, and the publisher. Institut Dirosat Islamiyah Al-Amien Prenduan Sumenep as a publisher takes the duty of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. Masyrif is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Duties of authors (These guidelines are based on Elsevier policies)

Reporting standards Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial opinion works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from ëpassing offí anotherís paper as the authorís own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of anotherís paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. All of submitted works will be checked by anti plagiarism software. Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

Acknowledgement of sources Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest All authors should disclose in the manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors’ obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Duties of the Editorial Board (These guidelines are based on based on Elsevier policies and COPEís Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Publication decisions The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.

Involvement and cooperation in investigations An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior must be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.

Duties of reviewers (These guidelines are based on based on Elsevier policies and COPE ís Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Contribution to editorial decisions Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method.

Promptness Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewers own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Contact Zaid Raya Argantara, Email: masyrif@idia.ac.id / zaidrayaargantara@gmail.com